28 ms·
I believe the simplest solution on Apple's side is to add a physical indicator of when the camera is on or off. It must not be software controlled, not even on
by vilda 10y ago
I believe the simplest solution on Apple's side is to add a physical indicator of when the camera is on or off. It must not be software controlled, not even on system/FPGA level. Best if attached on power on/off. With a hysteresis so that even quick on/off will be noticed.
Edit to add: Here's what may happen if the indicator is software controlled: "iSeeYou: Disabling the MacBook
Webcam Indicator LED" https://jscholarship.library.jhu.edu/bitstream/handle/1774.2/36569/camera.pdf https://jscholarship.library.jhu.edu/bitstream/handle/1774.2...
- dkersten 10y agoThe problem is, how do I the consumer know that its not software controlled? I have to trust Apple or whoever that its not.
- vilda 10y agoIf you use Apple hardware, then you trust them on many other levels. As for this particular feature, some hobbies or profs (like fixit) may have a good chance to disassemble it and check.
- demarq 10y agoThe internet is full of people who will take it all apart and test the crap out of it! It would be quite a claim and people really do love to put apple products to the test. see: bendgate.
- alister 10y agoIndeed. I had a ThinkPad with a physical switch to turn wifi on and off. The OS got into a weird state one day (a driver or OS bug) and I was shocked to discover that wifi was working even though the switch was in the off position. So even on a ThinkPad, these physical switches are fake, i.e., they are just software settings checked by the OS, and not a hardware override.
- rhizome 10y agoWhich is why I was glad Lenovo made it possible for me to order my current laptop without a webcam at all. I can just plug one in if I need it.
- js8 10y agoOld Treos (and maybe Palm Pilots) had a similar switch to sound, which was great. You could turn it off and be completely sure that no software error can cause any sound whatsoever.
- samuellb 10y agoOr a lid that can be slided over it. As a bonus, it would also protect the camera from being scratched
- vilda 10y agoI'm not convinced Apple design department will allow that.
- frgewut 10y agoIf you enable camera for a fraction of second nobody would notice the change of indicator.
- MichaelBurge 10y agoYou can have the hardware display for a minimum of 3 seconds.
- frgewut 10y agoEven that wouldn't be enough. And for some environments (e.g. living room) you would need super bright indicator accompanied by sound.
- alister 10y agoApple's very first camera accessory, the iSight camera, had a physical iris that you could open and close for privacy: http://static1.squarespace.com/static/50271a61c4aab6c54f9af5ee/t/531cc540e4b0b17f9741989f/1394394435408/DSC06402.jpg?format=1500w http://static1.squarespace.com/static/50271a61c4aab6c54f9af5... I thought that was beautiful UI, since you knew that the lens was being blocked; you didn't have to trust that the software/firmware was doing the right thing.
- jimboj 10y agoIs there any evidence of this being possible on Macs made after 2008?
- EvgeniyZh 10y agoI had some Asus laptop which had a switch to physically close webcam: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/images/images2500x2500/ASUS_N73SV_A1_N73SV_A1_17_3_Notebook_Computer_754854.jpg http://www.bhphotovideo.com/images/images2500x2500/ASUS_N73S... If you're paranoid, it could be transparent for IR or something though.