4 ms·
This author did not do their research. They are likely quoting from a fake letter that is not from the actual attacker. I did not personally attempt to verify
by pipermerriam 10y ago
This author did not do their research. They are likely quoting from a fake letter that is not from the actual attacker. I did not personally attempt to verify the signature, but others did and they report it being invalid.
The letter in question can be found here.
http://pastebin.com/CcGUBgDG http://pastebin.com/CcGUBgDG
The Reddit post where it was submitted to `/r/ethereum` here
https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/4oo1io/an_open_letter_from_the_hacker/ https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/4oo1io/an_open_le...
- jeffreyrogers 10y agoHe wrote > The hacker! Or, at least, someone claiming to be "The Attacker," who wrote this: which makes it clear enough that he knows what he's talking about.
- pipermerriam 10y agoAn invalid digital signature is a pretty strong indication that it is the fake. I'd consider this poor journalism as it gives this letter credibility that it doesn't deserve. My statement was merely to try and point out that one of his quoted sources is likely a fabrication.
- stale2002 10y agoThe fake signature may have been done on purpose. There was another interview with someone who claimed to be the hacker, and that's what he said.
- Dylan16807 10y agoSure, likely a fabrication, but it's being used as a way to explain the schools of thought, not as an actual source of anything.