4 ms·

I think semantic arguments are getting old. You took one sentence off one slide out of 21 and have devalued the conversation to a complaint about the use of a

• deleted 17y ago
  [deleted]
• joe_the_user 17y ago
  You can scan my profile to see the substance of my posts in general. Whatever you may think of it, my "small" distinction post here has gotten a lot more karma than the long analyses I usually post. The slide show altogether had little substance; a few interesting statistics, some standard rhetoric and a come-on for a product. Still, the craven misuse of the term "socialist" is doing more than a little damage to the body politic. If Obama was a socialist trying to change the nature of American society, that would worth debating. But he isn't, so the repetition of such a claim works according to the "big lie principle" (ironically articulated by Joseph Stalin) - if you take a simple falsehood, even one the most informed people know is false, and repeat it enough times, you get can serious traction. This method of operating is worth noting and so this "semantic" distinction is important to make.