8 ms·

Silk Icons: A Comprehensive Open Source Icon Set

81 points by JeffJenkins 17y ago

teye 17y ago
Silk is a fantastic set. Been using it for years and haven't found anything more versatile. Also recently came across the excellent (CC-licensed) Fugue set. http://p.yusukekamiyamane.com/ http://p.yusukekamiyamane.com/
- yesimahuman 17y ago
  Awesome! Thanks for that. Silk has been great but sometimes the icon I want just isn't there.
  - bmelton 17y ago
    You could, I suppose, contract the author of the silk icons for the icon you want. If I were a more cynical man, I might even suppose that was exactly the reason for producing a royalty-free icon set -- to drum up business.
    - scorpioxy 17y ago
      Cynical? What better way to show your skills to people who would contract you than to point at something as popular as his icon set?
      - bmelton 17y ago
        I meant it jokingly. It's a brilliant advertisement, to be sure; I think that most people just see things like that as done strictly out of the goodness of people's hearts, and while that may often be true, I usually am inclined to believe the more self-serving aspect of it. Not that there's anything wrong with it whatsoever.
    - yesimahuman 17y ago
      How do you mean? His site hasn't been updated for 4 years. I don't know anything about the author.
      - noginn 17y ago
        This is the author: http://twitter.com/markjames http://twitter.com/markjames
        famfamfam 17y ago
        I wish I had been foresighted enough to realise that the icons were more than the occasionally useful result of a period of insomnia. The set was started because I could not find a good icon set to use in a system I was developing. I have done almost no icon design since this set was released; The icons have garnered me some personal infamy, and I make a little from text link ads, but I would kill the site if not for the fact that people still appear to find the icons useful and reliable. For personal work, I use the fugue set linked previously.
- JeffJenkins 17y ago
  Wow. That's an even bigger set. I had been using these, but neither set is as comprehensive as Silk: http://www.tutorial9.net/resources/108-mono-icons-huge-set-of-minimal-icons/ http://www.tutorial9.net/resources/108-mono-icons-huge-set-o... and http://prothemedesign.com/circular-icons/ http://prothemedesign.com/circular-icons/
- nkm 17y ago
  It seems the main site is down, but you can get them directly from GitHub: http://github.com/yusukekamiyamane/fugue-icons http://github.com/yusukekamiyamane/fugue-icons
deleted 17y ago
[deleted]
gkoberger 17y ago
Here's a much easier way to browse them: http://www.famfamfam.com/lab/icons/silk/preview.php http://www.famfamfam.com/lab/icons/silk/preview.php Be careful, though- these are the most overused set of icons. They're like the Comic Sans or Papyrus of icons. Like another commenter said, if you're looking for some less-used icons, try these two (free) sets: http://p.yusukekamiyamane.com/ http://p.yusukekamiyamane.com/
- ryne 17y ago
  I think that's pretty misleading comparing Silk to Comic Sans. A more suitable comparison would be to something like Helvetica or Times New Roman. Ubiquitous and overused but still a dependable choice.
- roam 17y ago
  Or the LED Icon Set: http://led24.de/iconset/ http://led24.de/iconset/ (Though they look a lot like the Silk icons.)
rev087 17y ago
Someone also tried to expand the set, and hosted it here: http://code.google.com/p/famfamfam/ http://code.google.com/p/famfamfam/
stevenp 17y ago
Silk is a good set, but it's true that it's very easy to recognize in the wild. I think it's a good stopgap before you pick something less-used, but if you want your web app to have a voice and a point of view from a design standpoint, it's better to go custom.
- sidmitra 17y ago
  THe Silk, FamFamFam set are easily reconizable which might be the perfect reason to use them from a usability perspective.
dryicerx 17y ago
Almost identical to the this icon set is the Farm-Fresh Web Icons which also includes 32x32 versions and 1000 icons http://www.fatcow.com/free-icons/ http://www.fatcow.com/free-icons/
dtran 17y ago
I love silk icons! Really clean - I think we need to push for better standardization of icons though. There are too many sites where developers put the icons without text labels and I find myself mousing over hoping for a tooltop while trying to stare at a 16x16 icon to figure out what it is...

81 points by JeffJenkins 17y ago

teye 17y ago

Silk is a fantastic set. Been using it for years and haven't found anything more versatile. Also recently came across the excellent (CC-licensed) Fugue set. http://p.yusukekamiyamane.com/ http://p.yusukekamiyamane.com/

yesimahuman 17y ago
Awesome! Thanks for that. Silk has been great but sometimes the icon I want just isn't there.
- bmelton 17y ago
  You could, I suppose, contract the author of the silk icons for the icon you want. If I were a more cynical man, I might even suppose that was exactly the reason for producing a royalty-free icon set -- to drum up business.
  - scorpioxy 17y ago
    Cynical? What better way to show your skills to people who would contract you than to point at something as popular as his icon set?
    - bmelton 17y ago
      I meant it jokingly. It's a brilliant advertisement, to be sure; I think that most people just see things like that as done strictly out of the goodness of people's hearts, and while that may often be true, I usually am inclined to believe the more self-serving aspect of it. Not that there's anything wrong with it whatsoever.
  - yesimahuman 17y ago
    How do you mean? His site hasn't been updated for 4 years. I don't know anything about the author.
    - noginn 17y ago
      This is the author: http://twitter.com/markjames http://twitter.com/markjames
      - famfamfam 17y ago
        I wish I had been foresighted enough to realise that the icons were more than the occasionally useful result of a period of insomnia. The set was started because I could not find a good icon set to use in a system I was developing. I have done almost no icon design since this set was released; The icons have garnered me some personal infamy, and I make a little from text link ads, but I would kill the site if not for the fact that people still appear to find the icons useful and reliable. For personal work, I use the fugue set linked previously.
JeffJenkins 17y ago
Wow. That's an even bigger set. I had been using these, but neither set is as comprehensive as Silk: http://www.tutorial9.net/resources/108-mono-icons-huge-set-of-minimal-icons/ http://www.tutorial9.net/resources/108-mono-icons-huge-set-o... and http://prothemedesign.com/circular-icons/ http://prothemedesign.com/circular-icons/
nkm 17y ago
It seems the main site is down, but you can get them directly from GitHub: http://github.com/yusukekamiyamane/fugue-icons http://github.com/yusukekamiyamane/fugue-icons

deleted 17y ago

[deleted]

gkoberger 17y ago

Here's a much easier way to browse them: http://www.famfamfam.com/lab/icons/silk/preview.php http://www.famfamfam.com/lab/icons/silk/preview.php Be careful, though- these are the most overused set of icons. They're like the Comic Sans or Papyrus of icons. Like another commenter said, if you're looking for some less-used icons, try these two (free) sets: http://p.yusukekamiyamane.com/ http://p.yusukekamiyamane.com/

ryne 17y ago
I think that's pretty misleading comparing Silk to Comic Sans. A more suitable comparison would be to something like Helvetica or Times New Roman. Ubiquitous and overused but still a dependable choice.
roam 17y ago
Or the LED Icon Set: http://led24.de/iconset/ http://led24.de/iconset/ (Though they look a lot like the Silk icons.)

rev087 17y ago

Someone also tried to expand the set, and hosted it here: http://code.google.com/p/famfamfam/ http://code.google.com/p/famfamfam/

stevenp 17y ago

Silk is a good set, but it's true that it's very easy to recognize in the wild. I think it's a good stopgap before you pick something less-used, but if you want your web app to have a voice and a point of view from a design standpoint, it's better to go custom.

sidmitra 17y ago
THe Silk, FamFamFam set are easily reconizable which might be the perfect reason to use them from a usability perspective.

dryicerx 17y ago

Almost identical to the this icon set is the Farm-Fresh Web Icons which also includes 32x32 versions and 1000 icons http://www.fatcow.com/free-icons/ http://www.fatcow.com/free-icons/

dtran 17y ago

I love silk icons! Really clean - I think we need to push for better standardization of icons though. There are too many sites where developers put the icons without text labels and I find myself mousing over hoping for a tooltop while trying to stare at a 16x16 icon to figure out what it is...