9 ms·

I've been very pleased with the subscription experience on the App Store. The reason I usually hate subscriptions is that they are a headache remember, changin

I've been very pleased with the subscription experience on the App Store. The reason I usually hate subscriptions is that they are a headache remember, changing credit cards requires me to remember and update subscriptions in many different places, and providers make it hard to cancel. My experience with subscriptions on iOS has been very positive. It's easy to pay for and easy to cancel. Personally, I would rather pay a small amount per month while being able to cancel at any time than pay a larger amount up front for something I've never tried. If the app is compelling enough to keep using, I'm happy to keep paying.

post_break 10y ago
A simple trial period like Androids 2 hour window would avoid all of this subscription nonsense for your last point.
- adamlett 10y ago
  How do you evaluate the equivalent of say Photoshop or IntelliJ IDEA in 2 hours? Especially if you're new to that category of software?
  - post_break 10y ago
    You give it the full 48 hours android allows you. The 2 hours is only automatic refund. After that you have 48 hours to send in a refund request.
    - adamlett 10y ago
      Firstly, that's a hack. Secondly, even 48 hours is not nearly enough to evaluate complex productivity software. You might argue that the App Store doesn't have any software of that caliber, to which I would say that this could be part of what Apple is trying to address with this change.
      - post_break 10y ago
        Then why doesn't apple create a trial mode? Photoshop has one. The solution to try before buying isn't a subscription model, the solution is a trial.
- MBCook 10y ago
  It's not nonsense, it's useful. Right now you get problems like Tweetbot. It costs money to maintain Tweetbot and keep it working, and to add new features. I use it every day, I'd be happy to 'subscribe' to it. As it is now they only get paid when I buy the app. If I keep using it for 4 years I may still expect support but they're not getting additional income. If you don't have enough growth to sustain you, what people have to do is release a new version of the app. Maybe it's a big upgrade (like Tweetbot has done) but some companies basically arbitrarily decide "This one is new, pay again". And even though Tweetbot is great they lose money because people who are addicted to the app don't want to pay another $2. And they spam the rating for the app with 1-star ratings. For apps that need constant maintenance? This seems like a great idea.
  - post_break 10y ago
    If I buy Tweetbot today, and it works today, it should keep working tomorrow. If I want new features I will pay for those features, update the app or make them an in app purchase, or create a new version number and charge for it. This is like leasing vs buying, the only difference is with your example you'll get one choice, pay the lease, or pound dirt. I'd rather buy the app once and be done, and have the choice to upgrade at my discretion, than be forced to pay yearly.
    - MBCook 10y ago
      If you buy Tweetbot today, it will work tomorrow. If Twitter changes the API on Monday, how many versions back should Tweetbot have to support based on a single $2 (or whatever) a few years ago? That's the issue. People get pissed there isn't perma-support for apps that need constant updates. This is a way to make that more feasible.
      - post_break 10y ago
        Tweetbot is kind of an edge case since they depend on a third party. A better example would be an application that does something, like a notes app, like noteability.
- _frog 10y ago
  Apple's giving developers the ability to offer trial periods for subscriptions. In their example an app that bills monthly could offer either a week or month long trial period to users.
- NEDM64 10y ago
  Apple has 14 days. The only difference is that Google makes it easy for people to abuse the system.
bad_user 10y ago
Out of curiosity, how much money do you spend monthly on software subscriptions?
- salmonet 10y ago
  As a consumer maybe $30

post_break 10y ago

A simple trial period like Androids 2 hour window would avoid all of this subscription nonsense for your last point.

adamlett 10y ago
How do you evaluate the equivalent of say Photoshop or IntelliJ IDEA in 2 hours? Especially if you're new to that category of software?
- post_break 10y ago
  You give it the full 48 hours android allows you. The 2 hours is only automatic refund. After that you have 48 hours to send in a refund request.
  - adamlett 10y ago
    Firstly, that's a hack. Secondly, even 48 hours is not nearly enough to evaluate complex productivity software. You might argue that the App Store doesn't have any software of that caliber, to which I would say that this could be part of what Apple is trying to address with this change.
    - post_break 10y ago
      Then why doesn't apple create a trial mode? Photoshop has one. The solution to try before buying isn't a subscription model, the solution is a trial.
MBCook 10y ago
It's not nonsense, it's useful. Right now you get problems like Tweetbot. It costs money to maintain Tweetbot and keep it working, and to add new features. I use it every day, I'd be happy to 'subscribe' to it. As it is now they only get paid when I buy the app. If I keep using it for 4 years I may still expect support but they're not getting additional income. If you don't have enough growth to sustain you, what people have to do is release a new version of the app. Maybe it's a big upgrade (like Tweetbot has done) but some companies basically arbitrarily decide "This one is new, pay again". And even though Tweetbot is great they lose money because people who are addicted to the app don't want to pay another $2. And they spam the rating for the app with 1-star ratings. For apps that need constant maintenance? This seems like a great idea.
- post_break 10y ago
  If I buy Tweetbot today, and it works today, it should keep working tomorrow. If I want new features I will pay for those features, update the app or make them an in app purchase, or create a new version number and charge for it. This is like leasing vs buying, the only difference is with your example you'll get one choice, pay the lease, or pound dirt. I'd rather buy the app once and be done, and have the choice to upgrade at my discretion, than be forced to pay yearly.
  - MBCook 10y ago
    If you buy Tweetbot today, it will work tomorrow. If Twitter changes the API on Monday, how many versions back should Tweetbot have to support based on a single $2 (or whatever) a few years ago? That's the issue. People get pissed there isn't perma-support for apps that need constant updates. This is a way to make that more feasible.
    - post_break 10y ago
      Tweetbot is kind of an edge case since they depend on a third party. A better example would be an application that does something, like a notes app, like noteability.
_frog 10y ago
Apple's giving developers the ability to offer trial periods for subscriptions. In their example an app that bills monthly could offer either a week or month long trial period to users.
NEDM64 10y ago
Apple has 14 days. The only difference is that Google makes it easy for people to abuse the system.

bad_user 10y ago

Out of curiosity, how much money do you spend monthly on software subscriptions?

salmonet 10y ago
As a consumer maybe $30