3 ms·

It is literally highway robbery, as it is the highway patrol pulling you over and stealing your money.

• adventured 10y ago
  In thread after thread on this topic - civil asset forfeiture in its various forms - I see people do elaborate intellectual dances to describe or title what this is. Nothing more than: highway robbery, is necessary. You're spot on, that's exactly what it is, and it's nothing more. It's robbery. Using any other names for it, just assists the police in covering up what they're doing through confusion. Everyone should begin calling it robbery by police or the equivalent, and stop referring to it as civil asset forfeiture in public forums (that's only useful in a technical/legal regard).
  • unimpressive 10y ago
    In a similar vein, I liked the suggestion that we should start calling "Parallel Reconstruction" evidence laundering.
    • colinbartlett 10y ago
      "Officer involved shooting" These are all language tricks used to manipulate the masses. "Double plus good" is not a stretch at this point if we become complacent to this kind of manipulation. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-watch/wp/2014/07/14/the-curious-grammar-of-police-shootings/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-watch/wp/2014/07/14/...
      • caf 10y ago
        "collateral damage" - these sorts of tricks are not new.
        • OscarCunningham 10y ago
          The CIA is the master of yhese euphemisms; "extraordinary rendition" for kidnapping and "enhanced interrogation" for torture.