3 ms·
>The Pirate Bay doesn't infringe per the letter of the law This is your opinion. So far I haven't seen any US precedent for this, and it's by no means obvious
by ikeboy 10y ago
>The Pirate Bay doesn't infringe per the letter of the law
This is your opinion. So far I haven't seen any US precedent for this, and it's by no means obvious that it's not infringing.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- benmcnelly 10y agoHey did you know that you can go to pirate bay website and find links to content that may not be legal? ^ Am I obviously infringing as well?
- ikeboy 10y agoI never said they're obviously infringing. I said they're not obviously non-infringing. Your comment I would classify as obviously non infringing. Two obvious differences (not the only two): you haven't linked to anything, and you aren't being paid any money for your comment. Did you know TPB founders have gone to prison for copyright infringement? I think the judge did not feel their actions were "obviously not infringing".
- Dylan16807 10y ago> Your comment I would classify as obviously non infringing. Two obvious differences (not the only two): you haven't linked to anything, and you aren't being paid any money for your comment. If that's not linking, then the pirate bay doesn't link either. They supply a description and a SHA1. You have to locate the content yourself. You have to locate the people that have the content yourself. What if TPB didn't have ads?
- ikeboy 10y ago>What if TPB didn't have ads? Then it's more complicated, and depends on other distinctions I alluded to above.