4 ms·
You're not wrong, but from the a hardware vendor perspective, grandparent is right: an IOT device is simply a embedded/microcontroller market. Maybe with a bit
by aylons 10y ago
You're not wrong, but from the a hardware vendor perspective, grandparent is right: an IOT device is simply a embedded/microcontroller market. Maybe with a bit more emphasis on connectivity, but this is not new in any way.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- roymurdock 10y agoAgree on the definition of an "IoT device" but scoping that way misses most of the market opportunity. While the embedded/microcontroller tech hasn't changed drastically, the cloud/edge processing & analytics parts of the tech stack are new. The "services" business models are also new.
- aylons 10y agoAgain, I do not disagree with you. However, the hardware vendor (the one who sells the parts that will be used on these devices) still keeps selling about the same devices. And these are the kind of devices Intel has decided to overlook 15, 20 years ago and now ARM is eating its cake.
- minipci1321 10y agoInsisting on this vision would be missing a bit part, or even the entire core, of the new Intel strategy -- they plan to sell more Xeons to those additional data centers that would be required to process new IoT data.
- marcosdumay 10y ago> Maybe with a bit more emphasis on connectivity What makes it an even bigger ARM turf than otherwise.