4 ms·

tl;dr--- Google is the equivalent of 90s-era Microsoft because it is angrily disliked by some Apple fans, and it incorporates Material Design in its iOS apps.

cjfjdjcjfjd 10y ago
Uh oh, dang is going to throw another tantrum... He hates TL;DR's.
PuffinBlue 10y ago
I know that 'tl;dr' is frowned upon here but this particular tl;dr is better written and just as in depth as the article itself.
- abraae 10y ago
  Wry tl;dr's like this should be exempted.
aexaey 10y ago
That was a suprisingly accurate summary. The whole thing, including the incoherent rant about material design
rmvt 10y ago
couldn't agree more. this article is nothing more than an ignorant rant. i wanted to give it the benefit of the doubt, even though it's from macworld but oh well... just take a look at the two app comparisons. you have to be an idiot to write stuff like that and actually believe it. on material: google has, from the start, said it's a design style and philosophy that it has chose to adapt on android (and on the web too), so it's only natural they try to do it on ios.
bitmapbrother 10y ago
But it's okay for Apple to inflict their design on Android because it's Apple.
- Spivak 10y ago
  Apple inflicts their design on Android? They only have three apps in the play store and they all look like modern Android apps with material design. Example: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.apple.android.music https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.apple.andr...
- MBCook 10y ago
  But they DON'T. That's the amazing thing here. Apple does on Windows, which everyone has known sucks since the early 2000s. But when they released Apple Music on Android? It followed platform conventions. It actually made news in the Apple community because Apple DIDN'T make the Android app look like iOS. The Apple people I follow were actually surprised that Apple decided to be a good citizen instead of going with the usual "We know best".
touristtam 10y ago
I was going to write a similar reply, but since you've nailed it, I refrain.

cjfjdjcjfjd 10y ago

Uh oh, dang is going to throw another tantrum... He hates TL;DR's.

PuffinBlue 10y ago

I know that 'tl;dr' is frowned upon here but this particular tl;dr is better written and just as in depth as the article itself.

abraae 10y ago
Wry tl;dr's like this should be exempted.

aexaey 10y ago

That was a suprisingly accurate summary. The whole thing, including the incoherent rant about material design

rmvt 10y ago

couldn't agree more. this article is nothing more than an ignorant rant. i wanted to give it the benefit of the doubt, even though it's from macworld but oh well... just take a look at the two app comparisons. you have to be an idiot to write stuff like that and actually believe it. on material: google has, from the start, said it's a design style and philosophy that it has chose to adapt on android (and on the web too), so it's only natural they try to do it on ios.

bitmapbrother 10y ago

But it's okay for Apple to inflict their design on Android because it's Apple.

Spivak 10y ago
Apple inflicts their design on Android? They only have three apps in the play store and they all look like modern Android apps with material design. Example: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.apple.android.music https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.apple.andr...
MBCook 10y ago
But they DON'T. That's the amazing thing here. Apple does on Windows, which everyone has known sucks since the early 2000s. But when they released Apple Music on Android? It followed platform conventions. It actually made news in the Apple community because Apple DIDN'T make the Android app look like iOS. The Apple people I follow were actually surprised that Apple decided to be a good citizen instead of going with the usual "We know best".

touristtam 10y ago

I was going to write a similar reply, but since you've nailed it, I refrain.