8 ms·
Show HN: Chatbots made easy – Build, train, and deploy bots
- ne0phyte 10y agoWould be nice if there were a couple of example bots that you could try talking to/see some info about before creating an account.
- davidnels 10y agoDavid from Motion AI here. Definitely agree! We are building out our Bot Store which will be a great way to sample a wide range of bots.
- orky56 10y agoShould be on the home page, perhaps even above the fold already asking you a question with a side-by-side of the flowchart components being activated/highlighted.
- davidnels 10y agoThat's a super good UI suggestion, thanks. We just launched our public beta about 6 hours ago and have been thrilled with the response and very unique bots being created (particularly when people leverage IFTTT and Zapier too) ... we'll definitely be surfacing as many cool uses as possible ASAP :)
- dustinls 10y agoAny thoughts on XMPP? A sandbox server that allows developers to connect through pidgin would be a great way test their bots in real-time.
- retrodict 10y agoSounds like a good addition to http://wtfismybot.tech/ http://wtfismybot.tech/
- dreamdu5t 10y agoBots are broken as a platform. No advertising, no payments system, developers have to pay for hosting, there's no discovery mechanism because the messengers don't have bot stores... Why would developers be interested?
- dudemonkey 10y agoReplace "bots" with "internet" and this could have been a quote lifted from a circa-1995 Microsoft strategy meeting
- dexwiz 10y agoBots are closer to a CLI than a GUI, that is the core issue with discovery.
- cmdrfred 10y agoI don't understand the discovery comment. I don't discover Bob the copier salesman. I decide I need a copier, search for copier retailers and then give Bob a call. Won't bots work the same way?
- tyingq 10y agoDepends on which vision wins out. The phone handset vendors certainly have a leg up on being the "discovery" part, deciding which copier retailers you get exposed to.
- dexwiz 10y agoYou don't have to discover how to call Bob, which is analogous to finding the bot. But you may need to discover what jargon to use with Bob to make sure you get what you want.
- est 10y agoWhat stops you from building a bot that supports advertising, payments system, "server-less" mode? Also bot functions can be federated and forwarded quite easily.
- Gustomaximus 10y agoSuper cool concept to make this more accessible. Has anyone deployed this platform is a customer service enviroment? And if so how'd it go?
- davidnels 10y agoThe platform is only hours old in terms of public availability, but here's a pretty cool customer service demo bot that scans a knowledgebase first, but can create a helpdesk ticket if human assistance is required: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9IMsJW4ca0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9IMsJW4ca0
- IshKebab 10y agoMaybe I'm missing something, but can't a normal website do all that? Or is the idea that you can feed message-only channels like email and Facebook messanger to it? But then you could just say "We don't really provide email support; see our website here: ..." Kind of feels like using telephone menus when you don't have to. (Nothing against your platform though - it looks very well done!)
- flexie 10y agoDo the bots speak English only or can users train them easily to talk with customers in other languages?
- rmelly 10y agoMost of what I've seen is in English but there are some second-level services popping up that promise an API for chatbot translation, e.g. Cyrano (http://cyrano.unbabel.com/ http://cyrano.unbabel.com/).
- King-Aaron 10y agoI feel like it's the early 2000's all over again with chat bots suddenly becoming a big thing again.
- Jaruzel 10y agoThis whole 'bot renaissance makes me think that somewhere 1000s of old IRC Channel admins are raising their hands in despair, and quickly shuffling through countless CD-Rs of old TCL and Perl code to see if they have something worth re-releasing. Granted, the natural language stuff is way better than it was, but the current bot platforms that are springing up everywhere are nothing more than a language parser and an empty ruleset DB that you as the customer have to spend endless hours populating. It seems a very unfinished solution right now; We're going to see a flood of sub-par bots* on the market that are going to cause the end users to disengage within months. (*I'm sure motion.ai's bots are very good, and I am not singling them out here, just commenting on the whole bot thing in general)
- partycoder 10y agoMany people got into programming because owning an IRC bot was considered cool and they wanted to code their own bots.
- TeMPOraL 10y agoNow it will most definitely be considered uncool - since with tools like this one, every man and their dog will be able to get one.
- elorant 10y agoMy main concern is that this whole situation will not include only chat bots but it will also trigger a demand for crawling bots which could put a lot of stress on web sites. Then sites could adopt aggressive captcha schemes which will hammer usability and make the life of legitimate crawlers a lot more difficult. It’s a lose-lose situation , until the industry comes into its senses and realize this whole thing is a fad.
- TeMPOraL 10y agoThat and - assuming new crawlers will even bother to respect robots.txt - this may screw up the archive.org's work even more.
- berntb 10y agoI got an idea the last time I saw this discussed, which probably will make some present HN people rich: Bots which follow your own conversations/emails/etc, read the comments from other people -- and in another window suggest jokes, information, links etc based on parsed language. Just click to add the suggested answer. You could install modules to see suggestions from e.g. a stand up comedian, some experts for different topics or just the wikipedia pages for all mentioned non-trivial concepts, etc. A bot could e.g. help with fixing grammar errors. Everyone can be their own Woody Allen -- or get help to write as a depressive persona. Or as a Romeo. :-)
- fizzbatter 10y agoFrom an NLP standpoint, what is the comparison between this and other NLP products? Namely WitAi, etc? I'm writing a bot framework (code, not web service), and trying to generalize the process so the the developer can switch between different NLP providers with ease (to avoid lockin.. as much as possible atleast). So, comparing to Witai atlast, is your NLP better? Is it more flexible somehow? etc, thoughts?
- davidnels 10y agoOur value-add here would be providing the pipelines for one-click deployment (SMS, Facebook, Slack etc) and structuring of conversation flow, in addition to things like post-deployment analytics and insights on how users are talking to your bot. In terms of NLP, we actually take an agnostic approach to whether users want to use Wit.ai (or api.ai etc) in conjunction with our service, or use our NLP offerings. Thanks for the question!
- id122015 10y agoI remember the time when kids considered bots cool, and I had no idea about programming then, nor did I understand how bots were usefull.. But the problem is I dont understand not even today who would be interested to interact with a bot? And how is this service better than employing a programmer ? Some examples would be useful.