3 ms·
I find the CSMonitor to be a good source for review articles (not breaking news, but breaking news is rarely that informative IMO): http://www.csmonitor.com/ ht
by bpodgursky 10y ago
I find the CSMonitor to be a good source for review articles (not breaking news, but breaking news is rarely that informative IMO): http://www.csmonitor.com/ http://www.csmonitor.com/
I read the Economist and while I won't call it unbiased, it's honest and usually presents both sides.
For day-of news it's tougher but direct Reuters pieces usually have minimal interpretation and are pretty good.
- protomyth 10y agobut the Reuters' headline writer has a hate on for Israel. "Palestinian Dies in Ramming Attack" was one such title.
- JupiterMoon 10y agoWay to start a flame war.
- protomyth 10y agoNo, I just believe calling Reuters unbiased is not true. They do have a lot of anti-Israel headlines to the point its become a joke.
- JupiterMoon 10y agoOr maybe they have a lot of unbiased headlines on the topic and you are biased?
- protomyth 10y agoI think pointing out the death of a attempted murder over the people he was trying to kill would be an outrage in any city in the US.
- tremon 10y agoOut of curiosity, what would "unbiased" look like to you if "usually presents both sides" doesn't make the cut? Are you looking for more sides than two, or less than one? Something else entirely?