3 ms·
>there is an argument that current F1 cars are more energy efficient than a tesla It does sound like click-bait, but I see the point they're making there. No o
by ckozlowski 10y ago
>there is an argument that current F1 cars are more energy efficient than a tesla
It does sound like click-bait, but I see the point they're making there. No one is proposing we all drive F1s, but for that performance regime, under those conditions, F1 is more efficient with it's energy usage in achieving a target output than a Tesla would be. I'm sure that decreases dramatically driving at pedestrian speeds.
It reminds me a bit of when I first read about the SR-71's J58 engine. I'm trying to remember where I saw it (I think it was in the book "Skunk Works") in that the SR-71 was actually most efficient running at Mach 3.2 than it was running at lower speeds. Seems counter-intuitive, but like F1, that was the situation for which it was designed.
- nopzor 10y agoYes, the SR-71 was happiest at mach 3+. At these speeds, metal expansion due to heat would seal the airplane frame up too. Designed for its mission. Insanely, it would literally leak fuel on the ground.