4 ms·
I'm not questioning the veracity of the claim but rather the generalisation made of an entire company. For what it's worth an online article is still a third p
by mouzogu 10y ago
I'm not questioning the veracity of the claim but rather the generalisation made of an entire company.
For what it's worth an online article is still a third party source just like the friends you mentioned.
Surprised that I got voted down so much. All I am saying is that sweeping generalisations based on information one has not witnessed is wrong. Is that so bad?
- powera 10y agoYou did accuse someone of "slander" for saying something which has been repeatedly reported. Also, http://smbc-comics.com/index.php?id=4105 http://smbc-comics.com/index.php?id=4105
- mouzogu 10y agoSorry, I tried to change the word "slander" as I didn't realise it was offensive. There does not seem to be a way to edit comments. In any case my intention was not to be insulting or accusatory. It is just that from my previous work experiences when hearsay is passed around they become almost impossible to dispel - the onus of proof falls on the accused as opposed to the accuser(s).