5 ms·
You've just slandered an entire company based on third party information. Unless you witnessed it yourself.
by mouzogu 10y ago
You've just slandered an entire company based on third party information. Unless you witnessed it yourself.
- seibelj 10y agoIt's also described in various articles about the company, if you want to read more. I post with an account linked to my real life persona and I stand by what I say.
- mouzogu 10y agoI'm not questioning the veracity of the claim but rather the generalisation made of an entire company. For what it's worth an online article is still a third party source just like the friends you mentioned. Surprised that I got voted down so much. All I am saying is that sweeping generalisations based on information one has not witnessed is wrong. Is that so bad?
- powera 10y agoYou did accuse someone of "slander" for saying something which has been repeatedly reported. Also, http://smbc-comics.com/index.php?id=4105 http://smbc-comics.com/index.php?id=4105
- mouzogu 10y agoSorry, I tried to change the word "slander" as I didn't realise it was offensive. There does not seem to be a way to edit comments. In any case my intention was not to be insulting or accusatory. It is just that from my previous work experiences when hearsay is passed around they become almost impossible to dispel - the onus of proof falls on the accused as opposed to the accuser(s).
- mikeyouse 10y agoHere's a sourced article with the exact same claims: > “We were a ratchet crowd,” said one. “There were afterparties in our office where people were having sex, there were drugs being done. That company has done so many crazy things that a movie should be made about it.” http://www.complex.com/style/the-rise-and-fall-of-karmaloop http://www.complex.com/style/the-rise-and-fall-of-karmaloop Breathe easy, nobody was wrongly slandered.