3 ms·

I'm downvoting you (pretty much everywhere here) because you haven't provided any links to substantiate your dismissals and further you've come off rather unciv

I'm downvoting you (pretty much everywhere here) because you haven't provided any links to substantiate your dismissals and further you've come off rather uncivilly.

searine 10y ago
> you haven't provided any links to substantiate your dismissals Because it is the widely publicized scientific consensus. But if you insist. EFSA : http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/4302 http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/4302 EPA [PDF] : https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-06/documents/glyphosate-417300_2015-06-29_txr0057175.pdf https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-06/documents... NAS : http://www.stltoday.com/business/local/national-academy-of-sciences-finds-no-evidence-of-gmo-health/article_a7ffbe9a-5848-5826-aa28-6b75b3c947d2.html http://www.stltoday.com/business/local/national-academy-of-s... Safety of POEA : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15862083 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15862083
- aresant 10y ago
  I would suggest that you attach these to your top comment with an "EDIT" flag since primary source info substantiates your comment.
bcoates 10y ago
It's trivial to google the guy's name and confirm he's a self-identified anti-GMO crank with paper retractions. It's not reasonable to ask for citations on things you can easily confirm or deny yourself.
- TeMPOraL 10y ago
  It is polite to provide them, though.