3 ms·
From the end of the article: "... such as compelling researchers to share both data sets and the code for statistical models." This would be a welcome change.
by a-priori 17y ago
From the end of the article: "... such as compelling researchers to share both data sets and the code for statistical models."
This would be a welcome change. It seems very strange to me that it is not the accepted practice to make available any source code used in the analysis. It's an essential part of their methodology, and any bugs in that code could produce hard-to-detect flaws in their results (dropped data, rounding errors, etc). Just look at the work jgrahamc did on climate change analysis: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1128782 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1128782.
- applicative 17y agoIt is stunning in general that it can count as 'science' and a piece of 'scientific research' though the code employed is held secret. In fact, the use of proprietary software in science is at least as dubious as the use of .doc format for government documents.