4 ms·

BaseCase | Berlin, Germany | Software Engineer | http://basecase.com http://basecase.com | Remote, Visa Our primary product is a sophisticated web application

BaseCase | Berlin, Germany | Software Engineer | http://basecase.com http://basecase.com | Remote, Visa Our primary product is a sophisticated web application which allows non-developers create interactive presentations. We're looking for talented front-end and back-end developers. Our technology stack is Javascript / jQuery / HTML5 on the back-end, and Python / MySQL on the back-end. But you don't need experience in our stack - we know a good developer can learn on the job. You can apply here: -) https://basecasecareers.recruiterbox.com/jobs/fk0hffr https://basecasecareers.recruiterbox.com/jobs/fk0hffr Currently our biggest 'gap' is on the front-end, so I'd like to particularly encourage Javascript/UI/UX experts to apply. We're also looking for OpenERP / Odoo developers, to ensure our smooth operations: -) https://basecasecareers.recruiterbox.com/jobs/fk0hiy9/ https://basecasecareers.recruiterbox.com/jobs/fk0hiy9/ We can support remote workers, and are willing to assist in obtaining a work visa for Germany if required. We have been profitable for several years, so we can offer very competitive salaries, with stock options. Some relevant background videos: -) http://basecase.com/company/careers http://basecase.com/company/careers -) http://basecase.com/platform/video/ http://basecase.com/platform/video/ Our hiring process involves 'offline' programming tests followed by ~2 interviews. Cheers, Diarmuid Glynn / CTO

wayn3 10y ago
When you make someone do a 9 hour coding test and they solve it, you could at least take the 5 minutes it takes to write them a rejection E-mail :(
- vladimir-y 10y ago
  9 hours for the coding test should have already shown you something about the company
  - wayn3 10y ago
    Was up to 9 hours and took more like 4. Had some spare time so I knocked it out. I don't mind these things, but when you make someone invest hours, you should feel responsible for investing a couple minutes. Was one of these "do something pointless in OO so we know you're not a potato" with infinite space for random scrutiny. 1st year undergrad stuff that makes you reconsider believing in intelligence. For a senior software engineering position.
    - vladimir-y 10y ago
      Yep, that's what I meant. You in advance had at least few points that your bullshit detector should have detected: - Up to 9 hours for the test assignments, too time consuming assignment. Usually that indicates to a lack of respect for the candidate and probably to the potential employee. So you might be a lucky that you was not selected for the next interview stage :) - Proposing to do something pointless in OO for the senior position. Considering that points absence of the company feedback should not surprise you :) Thanks for sharing experience with that company.
      - wayn3 10y ago
        I hope you see how calling someone naive without understanding their motive could be interpreted as mildly offensive :P
- zimmed 10y ago
  So... I don't know if we got the same test, but the one they sent me literally took less than 30 minutes to do. Just a pseudo "AI" that took a few trig functions to solve. My guess is that if it takes you more than an hour to do a code assessment, you're doing it wrong.
  - wayn3 10y ago
    That's the first test. I'm talking about the next one. Wait for it ;)
andreis_ 10y ago
Went through the interview process, can confirm the red flags raised in this thread.

wayn3 10y ago

When you make someone do a 9 hour coding test and they solve it, you could at least take the 5 minutes it takes to write them a rejection E-mail :(

vladimir-y 10y ago
9 hours for the coding test should have already shown you something about the company
- wayn3 10y ago
  Was up to 9 hours and took more like 4. Had some spare time so I knocked it out. I don't mind these things, but when you make someone invest hours, you should feel responsible for investing a couple minutes. Was one of these "do something pointless in OO so we know you're not a potato" with infinite space for random scrutiny. 1st year undergrad stuff that makes you reconsider believing in intelligence. For a senior software engineering position.
  - vladimir-y 10y ago
    Yep, that's what I meant. You in advance had at least few points that your bullshit detector should have detected: - Up to 9 hours for the test assignments, too time consuming assignment. Usually that indicates to a lack of respect for the candidate and probably to the potential employee. So you might be a lucky that you was not selected for the next interview stage :) - Proposing to do something pointless in OO for the senior position. Considering that points absence of the company feedback should not surprise you :) Thanks for sharing experience with that company.
    - wayn3 10y ago
      I hope you see how calling someone naive without understanding their motive could be interpreted as mildly offensive :P
zimmed 10y ago
So... I don't know if we got the same test, but the one they sent me literally took less than 30 minutes to do. Just a pseudo "AI" that took a few trig functions to solve. My guess is that if it takes you more than an hour to do a code assessment, you're doing it wrong.
- wayn3 10y ago
  That's the first test. I'm talking about the next one. Wait for it ;)

andreis_ 10y ago

Went through the interview process, can confirm the red flags raised in this thread.