3 ms·
No, judges need to notice when a law creates a contradiction or a stupid scenario and not make such rulings. Judges are supposed to have "wisdom". Pointing at a
by MichaelGG 11y ago
No, judges need to notice when a law creates a contradiction or a stupid scenario and not make such rulings. Judges are supposed to have "wisdom". Pointing at a broken law, then breaking communications for everyone hardly seems wise. Unless he's secretly hoping this will force a big change in law and government.
- aninhumer 11y agoContradictions are one thing, but the stupidity of a law is subjective, and the judiciary should not be empowered to rule contrary to the law based on their opinion of it. Which is not to say they shouldn't point out that it's ridiculous when they make their ruling, and suggest that the legislature fixes it quickly.
- Dylan16807 11y agoThey are being asked to provide data that does not exist, and cannot be recreated. The stupidity of that is objective.
- bikamonki 11y agoCorrect,that is the point of judging otherwise we could build software to do it automatically.