5 ms·

It's all fine and good to point out how insecure SMS is, and various ways that 2-factor auth may have been improved, but I think the bottom line is that when yo

by dendory 10y ago

It's all fine and good to point out how insecure SMS is, and various ways that 2-factor auth may have been improved, but I think the bottom line is that when your adversary is the government, police and telecom provider working together, the means you use to protect yourself are irrelevant, if they really want to bring you down, they will. The solution is in democratization and lobbying for proper laws to be passed.

snitko 10y ago
The solution is to make it extremely difficult/costly for them. It is never democratization and lobbying, because for a person to see any kind of change in the direction he wishes, it may take years. And even then it's just asking your masters for permission. Technology gives us a quick way to bypass government, make it irrelevant.
- dcposch 10y ago
  No, we need both politics and technology. First, we need an organized and determined political movement to defend civil liberties in general and our right to privacy in particular. To an extent the EFF and ACLU fill that role, but I think we can do better. Check out the NRA for example--I happen to oppose its mission, but I am still impressed by its effectiveness. The NRA can literally decide which political campaigns get funded. If a congressperson supports real gun control, suddenly they have a well funded opponent in the primary. We need that level of organization. When our own ancient and tech illiterate congresspeople here in California try to ban encryption, we need to be organized so we can get together and replace them. Second, we need technology that provides privacy by default. For example, WhatsApp for messaging. E2E encryption is not magic, but it does make mass surveillance a lot harder, because there's no central database of everyones conversations. It does a lot to protect ordinary citizens from fishing expeditions. Deprecating plain HTTP, making HTTPS ubiquitous for the web, is also a huge win and is already underway. Both parts go together. We need to work on the politics and on the technology of freedom at the same time.
  - snitko 10y ago
    I really don't understand people who think politics is something we need. Why? Why do you need a select group of people to tell the rest how they should live their lives?
    - mvid 10y ago
      Sounds more like you aren't trying to understand it.
      - snitko 10y ago
        No, I'm just a bit exhausted from talking about it. Yes, I think government and democracy in general are bad concepts. Yes, i think people would be much better off without both. If you want to explore the idea, you just need to start asking yourself the right questions and if the only answer is "nope, can't be done without government" you're not thinking hard enough.
        johnchristopher 10y ago
        Your stand is not clear. Are you in favour of a complete lack of governing bodies or an enlightened tyrant or something else ?
        mercurial 10y ago
        Sounds like a libertarian, see his post above.
    - golergka 10y ago
      Because there are people who want to do that. And if you will refuse to decide on this group of people democratically, you'll get a group of completely different people get into that position via violence.
    - dcposch 10y ago
      If you want no government control whatsoever, move to northern Somalia. If you want good governance that respects individual freedom, you have to work for it. "The price of liberty is eternal vigilance." --- And re: crypto making government "irrelevant", to use your word, that's not how it works. https://xkcd.com/538/ https://xkcd.com/538/
- e12e 10y ago
  > Technology gives us a quick way to bypass government, make it irrelevant. If you actually could do that, it's very likely that said technology would be illegal. Just as it illegal pretty much everywhere to own your own tanks and fighter bombers. Just because you ignore politics, doesn't mean politics ignores you. And puts you in indefinite detention, or execute you.
  - snitko 10y ago
    Perhaps temporarily, yes. You can outlaw cryptography, but the more governments resist it, the faster it will take over.
    - e12e 10y ago
      Take over what?
  - snitko 10y ago
    Oh, and you're more likely to end up in jail for political activism than for inventing things.
- enraged_camel 10y ago
  >>The solution is to make it extremely difficult/costly for them. You realize that it's you who pays for it in the end, right? It's called taxation.
  - snitko 10y ago
    Yes. And that's why things like Bitcoin make it more costly for governments to collect said taxes. Less money collected means less funding for another round of collection and the cycle continues.
fauigerzigerk 10y ago
>The solution is in democratization and lobbying for proper laws to be passed I'm not sure that's very helpful advice for an activist who is working towards the democratization of his country and for proper laws whilst being thwarted by an undemocratic government.
frozenport 10y ago
Why are we trying to make it easier for them to bring people down? In this case they started monitoring the person, and got his contacts in under an hour. In a previous time they would have needed a team of people to find where he was staying and search his home.

by dendory 10y ago

snitko 10y ago

The solution is to make it extremely difficult/costly for them. It is never democratization and lobbying, because for a person to see any kind of change in the direction he wishes, it may take years. And even then it's just asking your masters for permission. Technology gives us a quick way to bypass government, make it irrelevant.

dcposch 10y ago
No, we need both politics and technology. First, we need an organized and determined political movement to defend civil liberties in general and our right to privacy in particular. To an extent the EFF and ACLU fill that role, but I think we can do better. Check out the NRA for example--I happen to oppose its mission, but I am still impressed by its effectiveness. The NRA can literally decide which political campaigns get funded. If a congressperson supports real gun control, suddenly they have a well funded opponent in the primary. We need that level of organization. When our own ancient and tech illiterate congresspeople here in California try to ban encryption, we need to be organized so we can get together and replace them. Second, we need technology that provides privacy by default. For example, WhatsApp for messaging. E2E encryption is not magic, but it does make mass surveillance a lot harder, because there's no central database of everyones conversations. It does a lot to protect ordinary citizens from fishing expeditions. Deprecating plain HTTP, making HTTPS ubiquitous for the web, is also a huge win and is already underway. Both parts go together. We need to work on the politics and on the technology of freedom at the same time.
- snitko 10y ago
  I really don't understand people who think politics is something we need. Why? Why do you need a select group of people to tell the rest how they should live their lives?
  - mvid 10y ago
    Sounds more like you aren't trying to understand it.
    - snitko 10y ago
      No, I'm just a bit exhausted from talking about it. Yes, I think government and democracy in general are bad concepts. Yes, i think people would be much better off without both. If you want to explore the idea, you just need to start asking yourself the right questions and if the only answer is "nope, can't be done without government" you're not thinking hard enough.
      - johnchristopher 10y ago
        Your stand is not clear. Are you in favour of a complete lack of governing bodies or an enlightened tyrant or something else ?
        mercurial 10y ago
        Sounds like a libertarian, see his post above.
  - golergka 10y ago
    Because there are people who want to do that. And if you will refuse to decide on this group of people democratically, you'll get a group of completely different people get into that position via violence.
  - dcposch 10y ago
    If you want no government control whatsoever, move to northern Somalia. If you want good governance that respects individual freedom, you have to work for it. "The price of liberty is eternal vigilance." --- And re: crypto making government "irrelevant", to use your word, that's not how it works. https://xkcd.com/538/ https://xkcd.com/538/
e12e 10y ago
> Technology gives us a quick way to bypass government, make it irrelevant. If you actually could do that, it's very likely that said technology would be illegal. Just as it illegal pretty much everywhere to own your own tanks and fighter bombers. Just because you ignore politics, doesn't mean politics ignores you. And puts you in indefinite detention, or execute you.
- snitko 10y ago
  Perhaps temporarily, yes. You can outlaw cryptography, but the more governments resist it, the faster it will take over.
  - e12e 10y ago
    Take over what?
- snitko 10y ago
  Oh, and you're more likely to end up in jail for political activism than for inventing things.
enraged_camel 10y ago
>>The solution is to make it extremely difficult/costly for them. You realize that it's you who pays for it in the end, right? It's called taxation.
- snitko 10y ago
  Yes. And that's why things like Bitcoin make it more costly for governments to collect said taxes. Less money collected means less funding for another round of collection and the cycle continues.

fauigerzigerk 10y ago

>The solution is in democratization and lobbying for proper laws to be passed I'm not sure that's very helpful advice for an activist who is working towards the democratization of his country and for proper laws whilst being thwarted by an undemocratic government.

frozenport 10y ago

Why are we trying to make it easier for them to bring people down? In this case they started monitoring the person, and got his contacts in under an hour. In a previous time they would have needed a team of people to find where he was staying and search his home.