4 ms·
One of the things that keeps me intrigued about this is that this is not the first time someone has claimed anomalous thrust from an asymmetrical EM device of s
by api 11y ago
One of the things that keeps me intrigued about this is that this is not the first time someone has claimed anomalous thrust from an asymmetrical EM device of some kind.
It could be measurement error combined with a little wishful thinking, or it could be that there's some undiscovered physics there and we're tip-toeing around the edge of the parameter space where it manifests. If that's the case, all these "X effect" systems could be working according to the same principle.
There are other cases in science (e.g. early transistor efforts and superconductors) where tinkerers and engineers hit on effects that were not understood and were ignored for a long time until we had some kind of theory that explained them and much more importantly told us how we might optimize for the effect.
The McCullough prediction that a dielectric should increase the effect seems easy to test.
- andygates 11y agoThere seems to be something that catches the imagination, but I suspect it's closer to that whole class of perpetual motion machines which consist of moveable weights on a wheel, than to a revolution in physics. There's lots of unbalancing wheels, and none of them work.
- api 11y agoOnly way to tell is to do actual science. :)