3 ms·
> Peskin's numbers look low, but your original claim ("64,000 in 2014") is wrong by a factor of >500%. You misread my comment. I never claimed a net gain of 64
by raldi 11y ago
> Peskin's numbers look low, but your original claim ("64,000 in 2014") is wrong by a factor of >500%.
You misread my comment. I never claimed a net gain of 64,000 people. I said that 64,000 people moved in in 2014, 52,000 moved out, for a net gain of 12,000 people. This is exactly in line with your census numbers.
- timr 11y agoYou said that 64,000 people moved in (incorrect; some were born) and that 52,000 were "displaced" (also incorrect). Every large city has a flux of people moving in and out, constantly. What matters is the net change. You can't simply take the top-line number, subtract housing, and conclude that everyone else was "displaced".