I wonder if we could agree that technology really allowed money to be transformed into speech, which is something the founding fathers could not have really env

I wonder if we could agree that technology really allowed money to be transformed into speech, which is something the founding fathers could not have really envisioned. So maybe restricting political message in the media would be a solution? Although I don't really know as I am not an american. Anyway, as long as unfettered free speech is put on a pedestal, it's never guaranteed to always benefit the public.