3 ms·

The amounts of money involved make everyone involved pretty greedy, I don't understand why that's so controversial. Ya'alls notion of "rights" is pretty distur

• jimbokun 10y ago
  So you are against anyone being compensated at the amounts under discussion? Which is a coherent, defensible position. Sounded like you were selectively accusing one actor in this dispute as the "greedy" one, which I think is why you got so much push back on your comments.
  • proksoup 10y ago
    Not against anything, just think it's fair to label those seeking large amounts of money as dick'ish and greedy. If money is your goal great, more power to ya, but I'm gonna call you a dick and not want to work with you.
    • danso 10y ago
      So you're implying that you'd never work with YC or Vogt or any of their investors? GM is spending $1B to acquire Cruise, which is a vast sum for a small company that has been around for 3 years. Even 20% of that would be a great payout for all involved, and think of how much money GM could have left over to continue to revive the dormant U.S. industry, and U.S. fortunes at large. By your standards, if YC and Vogt were ethical actors, they'd ask GM to reduce the offer, because building things and innovating is itself an honest reward.
      • proksoup 10y ago
        > By your standards, if YC and Vogt were ethical actors, they'd ask GM to reduce the offer, because building things and innovating is itself an honest reward. What do you need a reward for at all? Why are you trying to build something? By my standards, your motivation matters a lot, it sounds like you think people deserve rewards for doing things, I don't think that makes very much sense. Gold star you did the right thing, bullshit.