9 ms·
Android N developer preview 2 is out
- yincrash 11y agoI much preferred the generic yellow gumdrop emoji. The people feel a little too bland.
- mblode 11y agoHere is the Verge's take on the new emojis http://www.theverge.com/2016/4/13/11423722/android-is-finally-getting-better-emoji http://www.theverge.com/2016/4/13/11423722/android-is-finall...
- crwll 11y agoThe Verge isn't doing its research (as usual): The blob emojis are not going anywhere (it's just the "people" emoji that are being changed). See screenshots at http://www.droid-life.com/2016/04/13/whats-new-in-android-n-developer-preview-2/ http://www.droid-life.com/2016/04/13/whats-new-in-android-n-... for example.
- bananaoomarang 11y agoSlightly off-topic point about that article/the Verge. Is it just me, or is it in the Verge’s style guide for writers to assert their opinion as if it were one everyone holds. I guess it’s supposed to be light-hearted and funny, but it just seems snarky and pseudo-authoratative. Here the writer’s tone is “well thank God for that, finally Google has listened to the overwhelming majority of people, for whom this was a big problem.”, and as evidence they link an article which provides none for that point.
- rtpg 11y agoyeah I'll miss them too. Read a blog post recently about emoji[0] that pointed out that by going to human emoji, you end up having to make weighted decisions about diversity. For example, the kiss emoji in the Google set was two genderless blobs, but in the new version the default one is M/F.... Basically the blog goes on to point out how Apple has kind of taken control of emoji design decisions thanks to the ubiquitousness of iphones. App developers having basically only iphones has taken its toll. People include apple emoji even in android versions of their app! Basically you end up seeing google emoji only inside hangouts... [0]:https://eev.ee/blog/2016/04/12/apple-did-not-invent-emoji/ https://eev.ee/blog/2016/04/12/apple-did-not-invent-emoji/
- tommyd 11y agoI understand the point here and agree to some extent, but on the other hand I think using a standardised set of emojis makes sense for cross-platform communication apps such as Whatsapp, as I think the meaning of some of them is reasonably subtle and those subtleties are very much influenced by the specific design - for example, the Apple "person with folded hands" shown in the article clearly represents prayer to me, whereas the original Google one looks kind of creepy with its screwed up face. I found this to be an issue when I had a windows phone - for better or for worse, emoji are used quite a lot, and I sometimes had to think back to the iOS equivalent to make sense of them, as they looked so different. In my opinion Apple's take on emoji is both the most visually attractive (the proportions of the old Google ones are way off and the "slug" creatures quite visually unappealing) and the richest, so it's no wonder they have become the de facto standard. In fact, I'd wager emoji wouldn't have taken off anything like as well as they have if everyone saw the original Google versions, for example, as they lack the "cuteness" and charm of Apple's versions. What might be nice is if Apple were to make them fully open source - I've wondered before what the legal status of apps like Whatsapp embedding them in their app is.
- rtpg 11y agoThe issue I have with Apple's emoji is that some of them (like the "praying one") just do not follow the "spec" described. The hands totally don't match the "person with folding hands" definition of the Unicode codepoint. Might as well use wingdings... The unified look is useful, just wish they would stick to things that match the description at the very least.
- tommyd 11y agoThat's a fair point, didn't even occur to me!
- ptx 11y ago> the Apple "person with folded hands" shown in the article clearly represents prayer to me, whereas the original Google one looks kind of creepy with its screwed up face I don't think Google's version of the character is supposed to represent prayer, but rather asking for a favor (which seems much more useful): http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PlaWxKgYl60/TSvvov-JHbI/AAAAAAAAABM/KO8fGoYXblk/s1600/onegai+shimasu.jpg http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PlaWxKgYl60/TSvvov-JHbI/AAAAAAAAAB... http://stat.news.ameba.jp/news_images/20150114/10/9a/z1/j/o0400026501_compressed46-400x265.jpg http://stat.news.ameba.jp/news_images/20150114/10/9a/z1/j/o0... http://cdn-ak.f.st-hatena.com/images/fotolife/r/ranmaru-24mensou/20150811/20150811183626.png http://cdn-ak.f.st-hatena.com/images/fotolife/r/ranmaru-24me...
- yoodenvranx 11y agoI wish Google had added the emojis to the appstore years ago and made them updateable independent of the OS release. My phone will not get the upgrade to N so I am stuck with the old emojis unless I install CM14 in the future. Another problem is that there are way too many emojis on the keyboard and it takes ages to find the right one. There should be a "long press -> hide this emoji" option in the keyboard to get rid of the 75% you will never use.
- psykpsyk 11y agoThe last emoji screen shows the most used emojis, in case you didn't notice.
- Natanael_L 11y agoBetter yet, a search function where each character has proper descriptions.
- FreakyT 11y agoIf you've ever used LINE, they have a really nice inline emoji suggestion function, where as you type words a list of possibly related emoji appear (presumably they have them tagged with various keywords). Everything else about LINE is terrible, but I'd love it if everyone just copied that particular interaction.
- sp332 11y agoSwype does this too, although I never really use them, it is a cool feature.
- sardonicbryan 11y agoSwiftkey has this, and it really changed the game for me because it baked emoji discovery directly into my typing flow.
- _asummers 11y ago
- provemewrong 11y agoAbsolutely, emojis shouldn't have a race, gender or sexual orientation. They should be round and yellow. When they're yellow genderless blobs, they're universal, they transcend categorization. They're abstract representations of an emotion. This racially diverse politically correct human emoji movement is just ridiculous and can be more racist than not. [1] EDIT: What's more, if you go this route and truly want to embrace diversity you get to take a mandatory lesson in combinatorics. Consider the "couple" emoji. A couple should be any combination of two human emojis of any race and gender with repetition allowed (to allow same sex and/or same race couples). A family of three or four has even more combinations (consider interracial couple with adopted children). What about unconventional families, single parents, anyone? Why is there no emoji for an extended family? No wonder the family emojis are still nuclear and yellow.
- Natanael_L 11y agoSuddenly emojis becomes embedded SVG images...
- provemewrong 11y agoWhoops, lost the footnote [1] while editing the comment. [1]: https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/04/10/how-apples-new-multicultural-emojis-are-more-racist-than-before/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/04/10/...
- hythloday 11y agoI really wonder about the combination of ignorance of Unicode, stick-in-the-mud attitude to diversity and appetite for accidental irony that makes someone write a long paragraph (570 characters - that's at least 10^170 combinations of characters - basically impossible to store) about how it's impossible in 2016 to apply combining characters to emoji (which is how the diverse emoji are already implemented).
- provemewrong 11y agoI didn't imply that it's impossible. I just mean it is silly. Imagine that you need to pick out your particular family emoji each time from all the possible combinations. Perhaps you would need to enter your race when you create a Google or Apple account to alleviate this. Or perhaps the vendor has already analyzed the cloud stored pictures of you and your family members, determined the age, race, gender and the resulting family tree and handily preselected the appropriate emoji for you. I mean this is an exaggeration, but that's how ridiculous I think single "human" emojis already are. If you want to respond in a way that shows who you personally are, send a picture, today's messaging apps together with front and back facing cameras make it easier than ever before. If you want a quick impersonal throwaway response, there's always a yellow emoji. The in-between "catered to you" emojis are an awkward, uncanny middle ground.
- imaginenore 11y agoI hate them. They look like something out of the 90's design.
- abrowne 11y agoAgreed, and make them green or blue if the yellow is not racially generic enough.
- donatj 11y agoHopefully this fixes the random freezes/slow downs/reboots I'm getting on my 5X. Running the beta on my main phone was my mistake, admittedly.
- kaeawc 11y agoI've gotten the exact same thing. Also hoping it clears up
- tonfa 11y ago> Developer Preview 2 is intended for developers and not as a daily driver; this build is not yet optimized for performance and battery life. So probably not.
- lucasmullens 11y agoLuckily for you, everyone at Google has a 5X so it's bugs should get tons of attention. http://9to5google.com/2015/12/13/googlers-nexus-5x-holiday-gift/ http://9to5google.com/2015/12/13/googlers-nexus-5x-holiday-g...
- _xenonx_ 11y agoI had this bad then uninstalled the FB app & Messenger and it all cleared up. Maybe coincidence with a OS update that I didn't register but many online said FB was major stability issues on 5X so worth a try!
- e40 11y agoSeems like a hardware issue to me. I've never had any of those on my 5x. I had a 5 that had to be replaced because it did have a hardware issue. Bad RAM can cause the symptoms you described, and I believe that was the problem with my 5.
- dhruvtv 11y agoHow does one invoke these launcher shortcuts? Long pressing an app icon?
- delecti 11y agoThey'll probably just be additional entries in the launcher, my guess is they'll only take a normal tap.
- gcb0 11y agoafter Android 4, was there any single feature that wasn't self-serving? I'm still waiting first class voip. or even a single sms client that doesn't try to force me to use g+
- lucasmullens 11y agoThere isn't a single sms client that doesn't try to force you to use G+? I don't remember even the stock sms app doing that.
- gman99 11y agoThe AOSP built in sms client does not use G+ Google's "Messenger" client does not use G+ You can also use Google's Hangout client purely for SMS (you can sign out of hangouts) If you don't like any of them, there are hundreds in the play store that have no G+ requirement, and any of them can be set as the default. As for first class VoIP; again, I have no idea what you mean. Android has a full SIP stack that's built in.
- voltagex_ 11y agoThe SIP settings are tricky to find, the phone will fall back to the mobile network really quickly, there's no codec selection and no incentive to improve because PJSIP is pretty much abandoned (and seems to be the stack that all competitors use)
- kuschku 11y agoOn Android 5, most Nexus devices dropped all SMS apps for Hangouts. And Dialer, Launcher, etc also require Google Play Services now. I'm currently using the AOSP Launcher3, and it doesn't even properly align icons in a grid, because it's missing the autoscaling of Google Now Launcher.
- NeutronBoy 11y ago> On Android 5, most Nexus devices dropped all SMS apps for Hangouts. AFAIK you can download Messenger from the Play store.
- e2e8 11y agoI'm still bitter about my nexus 4 being dropped from M for no technical reason. Other phones with similar hardware got the update.
- stewbrew 11y agoThe seemingly dropped support for the Nexus 5 from N. Their "end of life" policy is the main reason I won't get an (Nexus|Pixel) tablet or anything else than a mid-range phone (in case they release one again). Maybe from a Silicon Valley perspective, 3 yrs old hardware is ancient but my old hardware is still 100% functional and has been battle tested.
- chambo622 11y agoThe Nexus 4 was excluded from dev previews but still got Lollipop. I think it's possible that the same may happen with the Nexus 5 in this case.
- primozk 11y agoWhat would be your alternative?
- newjersey 11y agoI think they're saying they won't get a high-end nexus phone. I'm price-sensitive as well. For example, I got my current nexus 6 in October 2015 only because it was on sale. I would be disappointed if I'd bought this phablet for $499.
- jahnu 11y agoI just got a 5X but of course I'm going to get the last update at the same time as anyone who bought the 5X back when it came out.
- mtgx 11y agoI think phones should get security updates for at least 4 years. Quite a few people use them that long themselves, as I have in the past, but even more people get them used from others, which means a phone gets to be used for 4 or 5 years pretty easily. Those should shouldn't be affected by a myriad of security vulnerabilities that come up by then just because they are poor and because companies would rather have planned obsolescence. It's the digital divide between rich and poor. The rich get security if they buy a high-end phone every year (if we are to consider Android's average security update lifetime), and the poor do not.
- rkuska 11y agoVulkan was there before? As everyone talks only about stupid emojis. I am confused. Vulkan seemed to me as a great big news.
- throw7 11y agoWell I guess we're past the point of no return of trying to stop the ridiculousness of some unicode characters (e.g. Pile of Poo)... what should happen is all these "emoji" should just be different font sets that we can pick and choose in our software. Does Android N allow the choice of different "emoji font sets"? I'm guessing probably not.
- noamsml 11y agoYou mean like https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjg98Ler47MAhVV7WMKHT6wBsIQFggpMAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FWingdings&usg=AFQjCNFNKVgV-tWpN8-9kAy3WjdDLTjZjg&sig2=AhyIf4LcUw1NY0NXcbQcAg&bvm=bv.119745492,d.cGc https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&c...
- throw7 11y agoYeah... Like google's current emoji set could be called... "PC Emoji" and if people liked them they could just keep using them. The new one could be "Material Design Emoji".
- sp332 11y agoI think only Samsung allows fonts to be changed easily without root. There are some several font-changing apps that work if you do have root though. Edit: Apparently this doesn't change emoji though, see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11496788 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11496788
- jimmies 11y agoWell except for you cann't have everyone agreeing on what fonts to include in their app. J