4 ms·
That is pretty impressive. Also interesting that FF 3.5 seems to perform better than FF 3.6 according to those charts. Edit: Ah, nevermind, my mistake.
by jellisjapan 17y ago
That is pretty impressive. Also interesting that FF 3.5 seems to perform better than FF 3.6 according to those charts.
Edit: Ah, nevermind, my mistake.
- jeresig 17y agoOther way around - be sure to double-check the raw data at the bottom (3.6 is considerably faster than 3.5).
- staticshock 17y agoYou're looking at the IE 6 slice, not the FF 3.6 slice.