5 ms·
I think Facebook, as a slightly younger company, seems to be on the same path as Google. Brilliant engineers, concerns around privacy, similar business models,
by anirudh24seven 11y ago
I think Facebook, as a slightly younger company, seems to be on the same path as Google. Brilliant engineers, concerns around privacy, similar business models, big acquisitions, huge ambitions, etc.
What would prevent Facebook from taking Google's path in a few years (assuming a similar scenario continues)?
- visarga 11y agoGoogle, Microsoft and Apple have problems finding the next big thing, that's true. But, at the same time, Apple sits on millions of apps developed by external devs, same with Google and Microsoft. Each company has attracted a ton of developer investment and that portfolio will remain valuable.
- ocdtrekkie 11y agoYup, as long as they have the current market share, app devs won't invest in other platforms. Meaning Google and Apple (in mobile) and Microsoft (on desktop) can mostly rest on their laurels.
- EvanPlaice 11y agoSee React Native, and Universal Angular2. Both Facebook and Google are gearing up to aggresively go after the mobile market. Apple is stagnating after Steve Jobs' passing and both companies taste blood inn the water.
- rachelbythebay 11y agoNobody wants to go through that again.
- disgruntledphd2 11y agoAbsolutely nothing. In fact, it's to be expected. Microsoft -> Google -> Facebook -> Uber (ugh). Each was very successful, and success breeds growth, which is not bad. However, as you keep growing, there's never any pressure to remove the lower-performers or focus. This leads to too many people for the (perceived) good projects, which leads to internal politics carried out in a destructive fashion. At that point, you're pretty much like every other company hated by their employees.
- EvanPlaice 11y agoFacebook isn't beholden to its investor's short-term interests. The company has all the growth advantages while the M. Zuckerberg maintains the voting majority. A lot of his decisions have pissed off the board but they've generally kept the company moving in a positive/profitable direction. Google has a ridiculous amount of resources at its disposal and 2 very ambitious founder CEO's to drive the Alphabet parent company but, in reality, only have one groundbreakingly profitable product; advertising. Mobile is taking over the web and Google's advertising capabilities on mobile aren't great due to technological limitations and the app store walled gardens. AMP has the potential to put them in monopoly position in terms of web browser market share. They can leverage search engine ranking metrics to drive adoption. Meanwhile ReactJS and Angular2 will are bringing 'universal' client-side webapps to the mainstream. Basically, the browser SPA frameworks can be used to create native mobile apps. I wouldn't be surprised if native mobile app development as a market collapses in the near future. As for the rest, they seem to be aggressively pursuing infrastructure development. Customers hate the current broadband/wireless providers and anything that decreases internet usage is a threat to Google's bottom line. Facebook and Google are driving in a smiliar direction as far as the web goes. Alphabet/Google just has much more resources and a much broader scope of where they plan to go.