3 ms·
Here you go: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RNKtwAGvqc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RNKtwAGvqc, it's 8 minutes, feel free to still hold your opinion after
by TheRealPomax 11y ago
Here you go: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RNKtwAGvqc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RNKtwAGvqc, it's 8 minutes, feel free to still hold your opinion afterwards, but challenge yourself to listen to someone give you substance instead of "whatever" reasons. They kind of matter a lot, and whether it's "Apple" or someone else is pretty much irrelevant.
- jokoon 11y agoAs I said, Apple shouldn't have made this "golden key" possible. That's on them. Same thing for the juniper backdoor. It should be up to the government to tighten up internet infrastructure security. I really don't see any initiative to do so, and it's the same thing for most businesses: there are no "security standard", mainly because all those communication technologies are very new, and a little too complex for engineers to think about making rules about them. Ultimately, the law will say the last word, because that's how things work. I don't think tech companies should do what they want in all the countries of the world. If apple doesn't comply with the FBI, that same kind of story will happen later for another company in another country. My point is that all those technology are new, so there is this vacuum which makes it impossible to really define things or protect yourself. All those could be solved if there were better security standards, or any standard at all, no data centralization (all internet is structurally centralized), and more consumer awareness. P2P techs are already quite secure, and would make things very difficult for intelligence agencies.