3 ms·
And that's because demand has exploded. If you look at the technologies available today and, say, 10 years ago, wouldn't you say you need much less coders now t
by kfk 11y ago
And that's because demand has exploded. If you look at the technologies available today and, say, 10 years ago, wouldn't you say you need much less coders now than then to do the same things? That means one of 2 things can happen in another 10 years: demand keeps exploding, in which case you might be right; demand stabilize, in which case good luck sustaining $100k+ salaries for college kids with <3 years of work experience.
There is no inherent more added value in programming than in other professions, it is a pure demand thing. Without demand, things should go back to "normal" with low salaries on the entry level side and high paychecks on the management side (because it's more valuable effectively managing 10 resources than 1).
- elbear 11y agoIf we believe that software is eating the world, it makes sense that more and more coders will be needed to keep up with the transformation. Will it stop at some point? Maybe, but when?
- brlewis 11y agoI agree it's supply/demand. If it were pure value then teaching would be the highest-paying profession.
- marcosdumay 11y agoThat's Jevon's paradox applied to services. The more our productivity increases (that is, our labor get cheaper) the more money people will spend on our services. That's of course limited to the maximum potential our work can have on the world.