3 ms·
> perhaps it could have been put more diplomatically As mentioned in my other comment I was relating a phrase that was quite common "back in the day" for edito
by gist 11y ago
> perhaps it could have been put more diplomatically
As mentioned in my other comment I was relating a phrase that was quite common "back in the day" for editorial purposes. This is what I don't like about the current world. There is no difference between saying someone yourself and relating either history or what someone else might say.
- mikeash 11y agoYou didn't call out any difference, and you strongly implied that you agreed with this old-fashioned term. And I'm quite confident you did this on purpose, just so that you could come back and whine about how oppressed you are afterwards.
- GrinningFool 11y agoTHat's one way of looking at it. The other way of looking at it (and the way your comment came across) is that you're using 'back in the day' as a means to say what you feel, under the veneer of not actually saying it yourself. After all, if it didn't reflect what you thought, why would the phrase come to mind - and why take the trouble to call it out? Underscoring this is that it's not actually "back in the day" at all. It's still a term that's commonly used.