3 ms·
The order explicitly requires the cracking tool to not be written to flash. Just as easy? Maybe if you ignore the effort to create it and secure it. I really
by aljones 11y ago
The order explicitly requires the cracking tool to not be written to flash.
Just as easy? Maybe if you ignore the effort to create it and secure it. I really can't believe writing secure software is being trivialized in the comments here.
- timr 11y agoThat part is exactly the same as what they've done 70-some times previously. They didn't make some FBI agent sit there and tap out 0000 through 9999...they installed a piece of software to do it quickly. The software was signed with their key so that it would install on an iPhone. The only difference is that this time the software they install would also have to turn off the delete-after-ten-attempts thing. (You're probably having a hard time with this because the debate sounds absoultely ridiculous when the facts are laid out plainly. Totally understandable. The technical debate is absolutely ridiculous. The legal debate is the only one that matters, but it's not technical at all.)