3 ms·
No, the public has to be scared into standing by while the courts force Apple to unlock a phone for the FBI, so there will be adequate precedent for doing so la
by lambda 11y ago
No, the public has to be scared into standing by while the courts force Apple to unlock a phone for the FBI, so there will be adequate precedent for doing so later in in more mundane cases, like drug dealers, gangs, and so on.
The thing that scares law enforcement is that in recent years, they've been handed piles of easy evidence that is recorded permanently and easy to access. While before you actually had to do an active man-in-the-middle attack, known as "wiretapping", and that required a court order with good evidence, now there's a ton of communication that is already recorded on persistent media, and all they have to do is find some excuse for taking a look at it to get a lot of extra information without much trouble.
- krylon 11y agoThis is the most reasonable explanation I have read so far. Especially given that surveillance tools tend to "trickle down" wrt the severity of the alleged crimes required to use them.
- musha68k 11y agoPerfect description of how we "just" need to see a return of "good-old police work" combined with modern high-level training. This stuff is hard and should be hard - apropos jobs and automation: it's also a great opportunity for politicians to align income levels with the private sector to attract only the best of the best (humans vs. "high-tech" toys).