3 ms·
"it could be parallel construction" is true in literally every instance since it's impossible to prove the negative case. This is becoming my cue to stop readi
by Godel_unicode 11y ago
"it could be parallel construction" is true in literally every instance since it's impossible to prove the negative case.
This is becoming my cue to stop reading the comments; when parallel construction is the most obvious argument, you've read the interesting ideas up thread.
- kevin_b_er 11y agoHowever, the US Government is known to have gathered hidden evidence in drug cases, then used parallel construction to hide the violation. So, now the government's presentation of evidence should always be considered in question. As it has shown dishonesty at the presentation and gathering of evidence and there's nothing that says they haven't changed their unethical ways, how can they be trusted to present evidence legally gathered? https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2013/08/05/the-nsa-is-giving-your-phone-records-to-the-dea-and-the-dea-is-covering-it-up/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2013/08/05...