3 ms·
I've got a rather large collection of large photo images. Images which I can and do want to work on, crop, tune brightness, contrast, etc, before publishing the
by Sanddancer 11y ago
I've got a rather large collection of large photo images. Images which I can and do want to work on, crop, tune brightness, contrast, etc, before publishing them. Webapps right now are amazingly primitive and crude for even the most basic of workflows, especially when you're working with raw images.
Additionally, in order to save the images I want how I created them, I'd have to pay a non-insubstantial amount of money to store them. By saving everything locally, I can have the full-resolution image for my own usage, and just pay the occasional cost to upgrade/replace hard drives.
Furthermore, I'm almost certainly going to have to have a copy of many of the images on my computer anyways. A lot of the images I make, I tend to want to share in 2 or more other places, not just a random web album. So again, the webapp usage story falls apart.
I'm also not always in a place where I have internet access which is particularly fast and reliable. So, needing a webapp in such a situation means that I can't edit and arrange my photos at all until I get to a location that has internet access. Not everyone wants to be hyperconnected all the time.
Webapps mean you're even more beholden to someone else for functionality than a desktop app. You are limited in how you can post your content, where you can post your content, and even what content you're allowed to post. A desktop application has none of these limitations, whereas they're inherent flaws in the webapp ecosystem.
- toomuchtodo 11y agoPhotoshop or Lightroom should meet your needs. Not free, but better they're not free: that means they'll stick around.
- Sanddancer 11y agoYeah, I've been moving my stuff over to lightroom, this announcement will just accelerate that move.
- vvanders 11y agoYup, Lightroom was tailor build for exactly this.
- pbhjpbhj 11y agoDigikam is good for photo management (though the facial recognition doesn't yet work as well for me as Picasa did 10 years ago).
- prostoalex 11y agoThere's Windows Photo Gallery with the obvious OS restriction.
- aethertap 11y agoI'm not a photo power user like you are by any means, but I've been using darktable[1] quite a bit lately and I've gotten to where I like it. Here's the blurb from their front page: "darktable is an open source photography workflow application and RAW developer. A virtual lighttable and darkroom for photographers. It manages your digital negatives in a database, lets you view them through a zoomable lighttable and enables you to develop raw images and enhance them." 1. http://www.darktable.org/ http://www.darktable.org/
- JBReefer 11y agoDarktable isn't half as useful as Picasa for photo management, and the UI is awful. It does have some nice editing features, but it's a very different product.