4 ms·
No, no, I get that. That's how I do my stuff and have always done it. We used to call that "progressive enhancement". But it's easy to say "ehhh just render th
by bphogan 11y ago
No, no, I get that. That's how I do my stuff and have always done it. We used to call that "progressive enhancement".
But it's easy to say "ehhh just render the whole page statically first then re-render parts in JS".
I'd like to see people demonstrating this with modern frameworks and tools. Because without people leading, it'll be JS-rendered static content for years to come.
- timr 11y agoThe GP wasn't saying that, as I read it. It was saying: "use progressive enhancement". When you insert new elements in the DOM with JS, you are re-rendering parts of the page. I see no other, non-invented reason that anyone needs to render static content with javascript. Devs do it primarily because they're annoyed that they have to think about AJAX logic, and want to write simpler code -- at the user's expense.