4 ms·
It seems you are conflating (intentionally?) "intellectual" with "ideologue". Also, what can this following sentence possibly be but doublethink? > Distrustin
by crux_ 17y ago
It seems you are conflating (intentionally?) "intellectual" with "ideologue".
Also, what can this following sentence possibly be but doublethink?
> Distrusting intellectualism is not a sign of irrationality; in fact I'd go so far as to say too strong a faith in intellectualism is rather the irrational position.
(What is intellectualism if not a deep faith in rationality itself?)
- rntz 17y agoI think he's trying to make the point that influential idealogues, more often than not, are intellectuals. I'd like to note that, even if they are correlated, this does not in itself show that there is a causative relationship between intellectualism and dangerous ideology.
- crux_ 17y agoI don't think jerf drew any distinction between intellectuals and ideologues at all, not even in an attempt to argue for causation -- it's generous of you to assume he did. To rephrase the grandparent comment's line of reasoning in a more sarcastic way: "Wildfire kill Ogg family! All fire bad! Ogg anti-fire!"
- jimbokun 17y ago"(What is intellectualism if not a deep faith in rationality itself?)" Faith in the academy.