3 ms·

Please don't hijack the discussion with flamewar-prone tangents. HN guidelines: "Please avoid introducing classic flamewar topics unless you have something gen

• rietta 11y ago
  While fiatmoney may have been able to state the correlation better, there are parallels between the regulation of encryption and the regulation of firearms. And this goes beyond just that encryption is considered a munition within the regulatory framework of the U.S. government. There are lessons to be learned by studying the legal history there.
• cgriswald 11y ago
  It's not strictly a tangent. The GP pointed out that the tactic being tried here is "tried and true" and well understood by many. Although the GP should have gone further and said that we should all be against such tactics regardless of which side of any issue we should find ourselves on. It's a very underhanded, anti-democratic scheme. I've also seen guns and gun control discussed many times on HN without flames. So I'm not quite sure it qualifies as a "classic flamewar topic" on HN even if it qualifies as such among the general population. I would also argue that the GP did, in a sense, have something new to say about it.
  • protomyth 11y ago
    It also gives us an answer, the National Encryption Association should be formed with the exact same tactics.
• deleted 11y ago
  [deleted]
• api 11y ago
  I think this comment is relevant.