SEjeff is seriously over-reacting to reject the entire article on the basis of a bad analogy that isn't even central to the material. If the article was pushin

SEjeff is seriously over-reacting to reject the entire article on the basis of a bad analogy that isn't even central to the material. If the article was pushing this system for use in HFT, that would be bad. But, this is just someone who doesn't work in the field that SEjeff is very, very deeply involved in mentioning that field offhand, in a clumsy way, once.