3 ms·
This sounds really good! I don't understand why people would buy the commercial license, though, so I must be missing something. With the LGPL, it seems like
by prewett 11y ago
This sounds really good! I don't understand why people would buy the commercial license, though, so I must be missing something. With the LGPL, it seems like you could have closed source and just provide a copy of Qt.
- taspeotis 11y ago> I don't understand why people would buy the commercial license, though, so I must be missing something The support. Same reason people pay for RHEL.
- distances 11y agoMany possible reasons, from the top of my head * Static linking of closed source applications * Apple's app stores * Custom Qt modifications without need to release the changes * Qt for Device Creation * Support, supposedly with prioritized bugfixes