4 ms·
In 2001, I bought my first LCD, a 19" Princeton Graphics monitor for $1200. In 2004, I bought two Dell 19" for $600 each to replace the original LCD. In 2007, t
by chime 17y ago
In 2001, I bought my first LCD, a 19" Princeton Graphics monitor for $1200. In 2004, I bought two Dell 19" for $600 each to replace the original LCD. In 2007, three Dell 19" LCDs for $400 each to replace the two Dells. Now, I can buy six 23" LCDs for approx. $200 each for a total cost of about $1200. It's funny how the number of monitors continues to increase while the total nominal investment remains constant.
I had been talking on and on for years about getting a 6-LCD setup and I'd even predetermined what I'd do with each LCD in a 3x2 layout (top1: IM/Chat, 2: Graphics Editor, 3: Putty/Shell, bottom 4: FTP/Explorer, 5: Text Editor, 6: Browsers). My techie friends laughed at me but at a resolution of about 2048x1152/LCD, I would have ample resolution for just about everything and I wouldn't have to alt-tab at all. My productivity in web-dev would absolutely sky-rocket. And since could rig my own stand instead of buying a $600 one, I could get my dream-setup for about $1500. I had built my workstation in 2007 to easily handle 6 DVI ports when the time was right. Now all I needed was an excuse to splurge.
Last month, two of my Dell 19" died, leaving me with just one monitor. My wife joked that I needed new monitors because she didn't wanna be married to some one-LCD guy. She practically kicked me out of bed and told me to find my 6-LCD X-Mas gift. I spent three hours surfing Newegg, Dell Outlet etc. and finally found my dream setup. Right before I clicked 'Place Order' I yelled out "Honey if I click this button, I'm never leaving my computer room." I don't think she heard me but I clearly did and for some weird reason I didn't like it. I cleared my cart and started looking for a laptop instead.
I've always been anti-laptops because come on, how can you even compare a 3 or 6-LCD setup to a laptop with a tiny screen, tiny keyboard, and crappy batteries. However, something went off in my head at that point and I realized I didn't want my perfect 6-LCD setup even though it was right there in front of me. I have wanted 6-LCDs every single day for the past decade - ever since I started making web-apps. But it was when I yelled that I don't want to leave my room that I realized that I actually do want to leave my room. Now I take my laptop with me everywhere I go and program whenever/wherever I want to. It's a very big change for me and my productivity has definitely taken a hit. However, my desire to code has risen and that is important. Who cares if I'm capable of being highly productive if I don't feel like it most of the time? I guess the take-home lesson here is that it is not the specs but the environment and experience the setup fosters. I still might buy my 6-LCDs someday, if I ever have a crazy do-or-die startup idea, but for now, I'm just happier with a laptop.
- oscardelben 17y ago> My productivity in web-dev would absolutely sky-rocket. I'm not sure about this. Context switching is not a good idea. Imagine that you are in the middle of your project and a new IM message appear in your first monitor.
- chime 17y agoIM is pretty much for working in teams. If it's on a different LCD it would be easier to ignore too.
- rdtsc 17y ago> (top1: IM/Chat, 2: Graphics Editor, 3: Putty/Shell, bottom 4: FTP/Explorer, 5: Text Editor, 6: Browsers). The mental cost of task switching probably takes a larger toll than Alt-Tab-ing. > She practically kicked me out of bed and told me to find my 6-LCD X-Mas gift. ;-) Probably because you kept whinning and talking about it and she got tired of it. > I've always been anti-laptops because come on, how can you even compare a 3 or 6-LCD setup to a laptop with a tiny screen, tiny keyboard, and crappy batteries. I am also in general anti-laptops but for a different reason -- keyboards. As long as I can fit 2 80 column code windows in my emacs I can work fine, but not if the keyboard is crappy. That is why I spent a little extra and got a thinkpad -- it has one of the best keyboards and an integrated trackpoint (nipple) mouse. Between that and using emacs I don't have to lift my hands from the keyboard at all.
- jamesbritt 17y agoI worked for a few months using only a Toshiba Portege 3440 (or something). 12" screen with 1920x1200 rez. Had the trackpoint. Sweet machine, great for travel. Now I still use a laptop as my main machine (Dell D830), but I've got some extra monitors (and other hardware as well). They're handy for glance-over peripheral stuff, but I work best with things right in front of me (mostly vim, bash, and a Web browser). This topic got me wondering if alt-tabbing for window-switching, or ctrl-Fn'ing to a different desktop, was all that much of a distraction, or a worse interrupting, than moving my head and adjusting my focus. I just don't see it. Switching apps or desktops via the keyboard is no more of a "context switch" than moving my head and attention to a different device. Maybe even less so. Finger memory FTW. Mostly I think I just adapt to what I have when I have it. Additional screen space, while nice, doesn't mean that much of a productivity gain. What makes the biggest difference to productivity is how distracted/distractable I am. With no room for IM or IRC and such, they simply get turned off or moved to a desktop out of view. With the extra screen, I'm tempted to keep them running off to the side. It seems a lot like closet space. They more you have, the more stuff you find to put in it. You acclimate.