3 ms·
I'm not sure if that's relevant. It seems like either you know the actual frequency for their subgroup, in which case you redo the numbers in the example, or yo
by hyperpape 11y ago
I'm not sure if that's relevant. It seems like either you know the actual frequency for their subgroup, in which case you redo the numbers in the example, or you don't in which case you can't accommodate that regardless of how you calculate.
A natural frequency is different way of expressing and reasoning about the same information as percentages.
- marcosdumay 11y agoWell, me neither. If you get the frequency wrong, you'll also get your priors wrong. Natural frequency does not compose well, but that is another problem. That is just what I understood from the GP.