3 ms·
Mind vs. Brain: Confessions of a Defector (2014) [video]
- justifier 11y agohttps://youtu.be/6Px0livk6m8?t=245 https://youtu.be/6Px0livk6m8?t=245 i found this to be articulated perfectly.. the notion that our current abilities in regard to interacting with complex networks: ~monte carlo; is analogous with copernicus's abilities to interact with planetary trajectory without calculus i only have a tangential familiarity with scale free, but as i understand it scale free is more of the same in regard to interactions with networks but i do agree that wholly understanding network trajectories will have a significant effect on our understanding of cognition, neuroscience, ai, and some yet undiscussed consequence https://youtu.be/6Px0livk6m8?t=4551 https://youtu.be/6Px0livk6m8?t=4551 von nuemann anectdote and quote.. as remembered: however, if the brain uses any sort of mathematics, the language of that mathematics must certainly be different from that which we explicitly and consciously refer to by that name today from the book(o): However, the above remarks about reliability and logical and arithmetical depth prove that whatever the system is, it cannot fail to differ considerably from what we consciously and explicitly consider as mathematics. . it took me some time and effort to find the lecturer's name: David Dalrymple; so i'll link it here(i) (o) http://www.amazon.com/The-Computer-Brain-Silliman-Memorial/dp/0300084730 http://www.amazon.com/The-Computer-Brain-Silliman-Memorial/d... (i) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Dalrymple_(computer_scientist) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Dalrymple_(computer_scie...
- p1esk 11y agoDidn't he abandon the whole idea of playing with neuroscience, dropped out again, and went on to work at Twitter?