3 ms·
Why? What possible reason would there be to use the old behavior, except for laziness?
by s73v3r 11y ago
Why? What possible reason would there be to use the old behavior, except for laziness?
- daveguy 11y agoNice. Thanks for attributing a negative personality trait as the only reason someone would prefer any other way.
- chc 11y agoI don't know if it's been edited since you posted this, but at the moment, the comment is a question asking why somebody would want this other than laziness.
- daveguy 11y agoTrue. I guess some would consider this a positive personality trait in a programmer. I think that's only for system design though (lazy for minimizing future effort required).
- squeaky-clean 11y agoBecause I'd like to be able to use the googleads Python client library within Python 3 without needing to fix 62,000 lines of code? I guess you could call that laziness if you want.
- takeda 11y agoYou just simply use it, if specific argument require python 2 sting you simply call bytes() on it. For example old_function(bytes(myarg)) if it needs to be a literal: old_function(b"literal") That's what I do, and works for me so far.