2 ms·
We also don't have an incentive to write programs that grant access to people who know a special incantation like '() { :; };' and yet we do. Point being we can
by shpx 11y ago
We also don't have an incentive to write programs that grant access to people who know a special incantation like '() { :; };' and yet we do. Point being we can fuck this up very easily, like any other bit of software.
I myself am on fence, on the one hand it is a bit like worrying about over population on mars, and there really is nothing we can productively do right now to research AI safety, the best thing we have are convolutional long/short term memory nets, and there's not much you can say about it.
But at the same time worrying is a great move if the alternative is to just wait until we can do something.
- joe_the_user 11y agoWe unintentionally produce programs while fail or produce small variations on their original purpose - give control to X person rather than Y person. We haven't unintentionally produced a program that had a whole range of unexpected behaviors. An intelligence having human-like "survival instincts" and etc would be a big variation on a tool.