4 ms·
Well, try it yourself :). Make sure to make it blind-test with the help of somebody else. Ideally such things would be subject to scientific studies. But these
by 1ris 11y ago
Well, try it yourself :). Make sure to make it blind-test with the help of somebody else. Ideally such things would be subject to scientific studies. But these are kind of expensive and nobody cares for mp3 anyway. I'm not aware of any recent.
Hydrogenaudio listening tests [1] are studies by volunteers, but they focus on non-transparent compression. Anyway, it also illustrate aswell how bad mp3 is.
[1] http://wiki.hydrogenaud.io/index.php?title=Hydrogenaudio_Listening_Tests http://wiki.hydrogenaud.io/index.php?title=Hydrogenaudio_Lis...
- e12e 11y agoYou realize that that test doesn't test anywhere near 320kbps mp3, right?
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- 1ris 11y agoYes, that's what the last two sentences are about.
- danieltillett 11y agoThis page says at 128 Kbps all the encoders were the same (a 5 way tie). Their wiki says at 192 Kbps MP3 is transparent [1]. 1. http://wiki.hydrogenaud.io/index.php?title=Transparency http://wiki.hydrogenaud.io/index.php?title=Transparency