10 ms·
We fucked up by not vetting the algorithm, that's definitely the primary lesson here. Mea culpa. Bingo. Exactly. I heavily criticized you in another post for
by PhantomGremlin 11y ago
We fucked up by not vetting the algorithm, that's definitely the primary lesson here. Mea culpa.
Bingo. Exactly.
I heavily criticized you in another post for 1) your initial choice of substandard algorithm and 2) your rationalizations (e.g. Google's "good reputation").
But that is ancient history. Here you're admitting that you fucked up, which IMO you didn't admit previously.
Also, kudos for your article which kicked off this entire discussion. In that article you showed that you carefully analyzed what was happening, how you went wrong, and how you could improve.
Even more important, you did this all publicly, both your article and your responses here on HN. Everyone learns from this. I commend you for your openness.
- Dylan16807 11y agoWell Google fucked up too, in a way that affects many more people. They used a broken form of an obsolete random number generator with a 2^30 cycle. There are faster and simpler generators that perform overwhelmingly better on statistical tests.