4 ms·
> I have provided them with more than enough information to prove all of my income is legitimate That seems like a roundabout way of saying, "No, I did not con
by gknoy 11y ago
> I have provided them with more than enough information to prove all of my income is legitimate
That seems like a roundabout way of saying, "No, I did not conduct any illegal transactions".
- tw04 11y agoYou can buy drugs with legitimate income. The fact he didn't directly say no the first or second time says the answer is probably yes.
- such_a_casual 11y ago>The fact he didn't directly say no the first or second time says the answer is probably yes. Your statement is perhaps true from the perspective of a 110 IQ individual. However, for the rest of us, it makes no sense to make such a silly assumption.
- ewillbefull 11y agoThat's a dumb, deliberate misreading of my comment and a ridiculous jump to conclusions. I have done nothing illegal. I said clearly that I made _one_ transaction (a wire transfer) and I said clearly that they questioned me on my income. Their concern is "where did you get your money" to which I answered them thoroughly.
- mirimir 11y agoI had no idea that KYC now has such onerous proof of income requirements. It's mind boggling.
- unclebucknasty 11y agoNo. It actually seems like a concise way of explaining how coinbase has been deficient in the commenter's experience. That the transactions were believed to be legitimate was strongly implied in the same sentence, which just required a little deduction on your part.