3 ms·
That one struck me as a "wait, what!?" as well, especially considering a few paragraphs down, there's: We don’t have to go back in time to heed environmental b
by Karunamon 11y ago
That one struck me as a "wait, what!?" as well, especially considering a few paragraphs down, there's:
We don’t have to go back in time to heed environmental boundaries.
..pretty sure not using sanitary toilet paper in favor of touching feces is "going back in time", and I'd place using more water as a greater environmental issue than using less of a product that can be made from recycled things anyways.
- Scoundreller 11y ago> using more water as a greater environmental issue He's in Michigan, they're not running out anytime soon. The water gets recycled too, in minutes/hours instead of decades for trees. It's going back to (probably) the same lake it came from, not letting it evaporate on a farmer's field.