3 ms·
Why do you call it efficient? They were scanning a book every few seconds! While cutting the spines off and running the pages through a sheet feeder requires su
by david-given 11y ago
Why do you call it efficient? They were scanning a book every few seconds! While cutting the spines off and running the pages through a sheet feeder requires sustained human interaction for every book.
- Natanael_L 11y agoNot speed-wise. Complexity-wise. And there's a real risk of mismatched pieces. They'd all have to have predictable unqiue shapes otherwise.
- bazzargh 11y agoIn the book, one character explains that tearing rather than cutting the books is specifically to get unpredictable unique shapes along the tears, to make matching for reconstruction possible... There will be some loss, true. Even where everything is properly photoed, the programs will make some mismatches. Potentially, the error rate can be less than a few words per million volumes, far better than even hardcopy republishing with manual copyediting. -- Sharif, Rainbow's End p 129 But of course this is fiction. The parallels to what Harvard are doing are obvious, but I don't think anyone would seriously suggest building the Libreanome project in the real world.
- GFK_of_xmaspast 11y ago> They were scanning a book every few seconds What's the hurry?
- bpodgursky 11y agoIIRC that was part of the plot too. There was no string reason to prefer this technology, except the company that owned the destructive-scanning IP was pushing their solution before the other ones matured enough to be cost-effective.