I agree when we're talking about that extreme, but I don't think we have evidence that their CEO was a total fraud. He was just the figurehead of a scandal that

I agree when we're talking about that extreme, but I don't think we have evidence that their CEO was a total fraud. He was just the figurehead of a scandal that may or may not have involved him, and if it did involve him that doesn't necessarily mean he held sole responsibility. In fact, this notion that he wasn't performing his agreed upon duties might be spectacularly false if the whole executive team was in on it. For all we know his resignation was simply a PR stunt to make it seem as if the company is recoiling in shock at the revelations.