I don't think anyone was "pretending the original analysis doesn't exist". Your willingness to believe that it was a deliberate act of deception rather than a m

I don't think anyone was "pretending the original analysis doesn't exist". Your willingness to believe that it was a deliberate act of deception rather than a minor error (I'm not even convinced it was an error, truly) is more troubling than anything else I'm reading here. Is open source really this toxic?